labor lawDOLemployment

Understanding Wage Theft: How the Department of Labor Enforced Back Wages in the Wisconsin Case

ggovernments

2026-01-27

10 min read

How a federal court ordered North Central Health Care to pay $162K for unpaid hours—what the DOL found and what employers and employees must do now.

Hook: Why this Wisconsin wage-theft ruling matters to students, teachers, case managers and employers in 2026

Many readers come here frustrated: official wage and hour rules are scattered across agency pages and legal texts, and when pay is wrong especially for overtime or "off-the-clock" time it can feel impossible to get relief. The recent federal court order against a Wisconsin multi-county medical care partnership shows how the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) enforces wage laws, how back wages and liquidated damages are calculated, and what employers and employees must do now to avoid or respond to wage-theft claims. For employers managing mobile records, consider field-friendly systems like spreadsheet-first edge datastores to make audits less painful.

Executive summary: What happened in the Wisconsin case (quick facts)

A federal court entered a consent judgment on Dec. 4, 2025 requiring North Central Community Services Program and Affiliates (doing business as North Central Health Care) to pay $162,486.
The payment covers $81,243 in back wages plus an equal amount in liquidated damages to 68 case managers.
The U.S. Department of Labors Wage and Hour Division (WHD) found that between June 17, 2021 and June 16, 2023 the employer failed to record and pay all hours worked, including overtime, violating the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA).
This is a representative enforcement action showing DOL priorities in late 2025 and early 2026: healthcare sector scrutiny, off-the-clock supervision, and recordkeeping violations.

The legal basis: FLSA overtime, recordkeeping and liquidated damages

The DOL enforces the Fair Labor Standards Act. Two provisions mattered in this case:

1. Overtime pay (time-and-a-half)

Under the FLSA, employers must pay nonexempt employees at least one and one-half times their regular rate of pay for all hours worked over 40 in a workweek. The DOL explains the calculation of the regular rate and overtime adjustments. When employees perform unpaid work before or after shifts driving between clients, finalizing notes, or checking messages those hours often qualify as compensable work time. Capturing those minutes often means integrating time capture into case notes and electronic logs rather than relying on memory; see field reports on lightweight field data stores.

2. Recordkeeping

The FLSA requires employers to keep accurate records of hours worked and wages paid. The WHD enforces recordkeeping under 29 CFR Part 516 and treats inaccurate or missing records as a separate violation because missing data often correlates with unpaid wages. If your organization uses centralized systems, consider how cloud data warehouses and defensible retention policies support audits.

3. Liquidated damages

If the DOL proves a violation, courts commonly award liquidated damages equal to the amount of unpaid wages, effectively doubling the monetary exposure. The Wisconsin judgment follows that pattern: back wages plus equal liquidated damages.

The agencys enforcement sequence in this case illustrates the typical path a DOL wage enforcement action follows:

Complaint or tip: An employee, former employee, or third party files a complaint with WHD, or WHD opens an investigation based on data or referrals.
Investigation: WHD investigators audit payrolls, interview employees, and review time records, schedules, electronic logs, messages and case notes. They assess whether time was worked but not recorded.
Determination & negotiation: If WHD finds violations, it proposes a remedy back wages and, when appropriate, liquidated damages and negotiates with the employer. Employers sometimes enter into a settlement or a consent judgment.
Litigation: If the employer does not cooperate, the DOL may file suit in federal court. A court judgment, like the one entered Dec. 4, 2025 in Wisconsin, makes the award enforceable as a federal judgment.
Collection and compliance monitoring: The DOL monitors payment and may take collection steps if necessary. Courts can use normal judgment-enforcement tools (garnishment, liens) to collect unpaid amounts.

Case study: Breaking down the Wisconsin award

Using the reported totals helps make the math concrete. The judgment ordered $162,486 total for 68 employees, split evenly between back wages and liquidated damages.

Back wages: $81,243
Liquidated damages: $81,243
Average back wage per employee: approximately $1,195 ($81,243 68)

This average underscores a common DOL finding: violations do not always involve dramatic single-payroll errors. Often they are many small unpaid increments 1010 minutes of unrecorded work after each client visit, missed overtime accumulations, or unrecorded travel time that aggregate into significant liability over months or years.

Why this ruling matters: broader implications for 2026

Beyond the immediate relief for 68 case managers, the case highlights several 2026 trends employers and workers should know:

Heightened DOL focus on healthcare and homecare: The WHD increased investigations into healthcare employers in late 2025, targeting off-the-clock documentation and compensable travel time for case managers and home health aides. Healthcare providers evaluating kiosk or triage deployments should review medical deployment case studies such as edge-first triage kiosks to understand device-level logging and privacy trade-offs.
Remote and mobile work complicates recordkeeping: Modern case management involves travel, electronic charting and after-hours messaging, making accurate time capture harder and more scrutinized by regulators. Hybrid and field workflows guides (see hybrid edge workflows) help organizations design reliable capture without overwhelming staff.
Data-driven enforcement: The WHD is using analytics and complaint triage to prioritize cases with patterns of repeated small violations.
Financial exposure remains significant: Liquidated damages can double wage liability, and costs include attorneys fees, interest and reputational harm.

Practical, actionable advice for employers (compliance checklist)

Employers can reduce enforcement risk with a structured compliance program. Here are step-by-step actions to take now:

Conduct a wage-and-hour audit: Review classification (exempt vs. nonexempt), timekeeping records, and payroll for the past 3 years. Focus on employees with off-site duties like case managers. Use field-friendly data capture patterns from spreadsheet-first approaches to reconstruct missing entries.
Improve time capture: Use reliable electronic timekeeping with geolocation or client-visit prompts for mobile staff. Require clock-in/clock-out for all compensable work, including travel between clients if applicable under FLSA.
Clarify policies: Update written policies to specify compensable activities (note-taking, travel time, mandatory trainings), overtime approval, and procedures for reporting missed time.
Train managers and staff: Train supervisors to avoid encouraging off-the-clock work and to properly record hours. Provide employees clear instructions on how to record extra minutes or after-hours tasks.
Fix payroll errors promptly: If an internal audit uncovers unpaid hours, correct payroll and document the correction. Voluntary remediation can reduce the likelihood of litigation or liquidated damages in some circumstances.
Keep accurate records: Maintain time and payroll records for at least three years as required by FLSA and DOL guidance (recordkeeping rules are in 29 CFR Part 516). If you use a centralized stack, read reviews of cloud data warehouses and retention options.
Engage counsel for complex issues: For classification or regular-rate calculations involving different pay elements (bonuses, differential pay, shift premiums), consult a wage-and-hour attorney.

Practical, actionable advice for employees and case managers

If you are a case manager or similar worker worried about unpaid time, take these steps:

Document your time: Keep a contemporaneous log of hours worked, including travel, client time, calls and after-hours work. Screenshots, messages, emails and calendar entries help.
Report missed pay immediately: Notify payroll and HR in writing if hours are missing. Keep copies of communications.
File a WHD complaint: If internal fixes fail, file a complaint with the DOL Wage and Hour Division online or by phone. WHD investigates and protects confidentiality to the extent possible. See DOL WHD.
Understand time limits: FLSA claims generally must be brought within two years, or three years for willful violations so act promptly if you suspect theft of pay.
Seek legal advice when needed: For large claims or retaliation concerns, consult an employment attorney about private lawsuits or union remedies.

How back wages and liquidated damages are calculated — a plain-language guide

Understanding the math helps demystify settlements:

Back wages: The DOL calculates unpaid straight-time and overtime by reconstructing hours worked and applying the correct regular rate. If overtime was unpaid, back wages equal the unpaid overtime premium (usually 0.5 times the regular rate for hours over 40).
Regular rate adjustments: Non-discretionary bonuses, shift differentials and certain allowances must be included in the regular rate, increasing the overtime multiplier.
Liquidated damages: Usually equal to back wages, effectively doubling the monetary liability if the court grants them. Courts may sometimes reduce or deny liquidated damages if the employer shows good faith compliance efforts and reasonable grounds for believing its conduct was lawful.
Interest and fees: Final judgments can include interest and the prevailing partys attorneys fees, adding to total costs.

Enforcement tools and collection: what DOL can do after a judgment

Once a federal court enters a judgment, the DOL has several options to secure payment:

Work with the Department of Justice to enforce judgments.
Negotiate payment plans if the employer lacks immediate funds, while preserving the judgment for enforcement.
Pursue garnishment, liens or other judicial remedies available for federal judgments. Organizations with heavy field operations should ensure their collection and compliance monitoring integrates with database retention and enforcement workflows discussed in cloud reviews like cloud data warehouse reviews.

Practical takeaway: a consent judgment is not just a PR event it creates a legal obligation enforceable like other federal judgments.

Advanced strategies and future predictions for 2026 and beyond

Looking ahead, here are trends and strategic moves to watch:

Increased sector-specific enforcement: Expect more targeted sweeps in healthcare, home care and gig-support services where mobile work and unpaid time are frequent.
Tech-driven compliance: Employers will increasingly deploy timekeeping apps integrated with EHRs (electronic health records) and travel logs to generate defensible records. But tech must be paired with policies automated tracking without clear rules can create liability if employees are not paid for recorded time.
State and federal coordination: Some states are expanding wage enforcement and coordinating with DOL. Employers must monitor both federal and state rules (for example, state meal-break laws or local ordinances may impose additional obligations).
Greater whistleblower protections and anonymous reporting: Employees can report anonymously to WHD; DOL continues to refine protections and investigative techniques that rely on data and whistleblower leads.

Common employer misconceptions that lead to wage theft claims

"Off-the-clock work is too small to matter" small unpaid increments add up and are a frequent basis for WHD claims.
"Using a smartphone means time isnt compensable" electronic communications and charting can be compensable if required by the employer or necessary to perform duties.
"Training and travel are non-compensable" some training and certain travel may be compensable under FLSA.

Where to find authoritative resources and next steps

Authoritative, up-to-date resources:

DOL Wage and Hour Division: https://www.dol.gov/agencies/whd
FLSA regular-rate guidance: Regular Rate Fact Sheet
Recordkeeping rules (29 CFR Part 516): available through the DOL or the Electronic Code of Federal Regulations. See also practical guidance for hybrid capture in hybrid edge workflows.

Remember: The DOL enforces not only wages but also accurate records. Small daily errors in timekeeping are what often trigger large cumulative liabilities.

Final checklist: Immediate steps if youre an employer or employee affected by the Wisconsin ruling

If youre an employer:

Run a focused audit for mobile staff and case managers for the prior 3 years.
Fix payroll errors and document remediation steps.
Update policies and train supervisors on accurate time reporting.
Consult counsel if WHD contacts you early cooperation is often beneficial.

If youre an employee or case manager:

Archive time logs, messages and calendars showing work time.
Raise the issue with HR in writing; if unresolved, file a WHD complaint.
Act promptly FLSA limitations can shorten remedies if you wait.

Call to action

Wage theft cases like the Wisconsin judgment are a practical lesson: accurate timekeeping, clear policies and prompt remediation matter. If youre an employer, start a wage-and-hour audit today. If youre an employee who suspects unpaid work, collect evidence and contact the DOL Wage and Hour Division or an employment lawyer. Stay informed subscribe to our compliance briefings for updates on DOL enforcement trends in 2026 and sector-specific guidance for healthcare and social services.

governments

Contributor

Senior editor and content strategist. Writing about technology, design, and the future of digital media. Follow along for deep dives into the industry's moving parts.